A meta-analysis of the relationship between metacognition and academic achievement in mathematics: From preschool to university
Abstract
Many studies have explored the relationship between metacognition and academic achievement in mathematics, but the results vary. In this study, meta-analysis was used to explore this relationship between metacognition and academic achievement in mathematics and influencing factors. According to the literature search, a total of 147 studies (1986-2024) and 338 independent samples met the inclusion criteria (n = 698,096). The results revealed metacognition was significantly positively correlated with academic achievement in mathematics, r = 0.32, 95 % CI [0.30, 0.34], Z = 28.49. Moreover, the moderating effects of age, domain, and culture were significant (p < 0.01). In conclusion, Metacognition is closely associated with academic achievement in mathematics but also that age, domain, and culture have a considerable impact on their relationship. More specifically, the degree of correlation between metacognition and academic achievement in mathematics was on the rise from preschool to high school, while it was lower in college. Compared with general field metacognition, mathematical metacognition is more closely linked to mathematics academic achievement. Lastly, compared with British and American countries, Chinese metacognition was more closely related to academic achievement in mathematics.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 698,096 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.