Evidence Hub

Efficacy of robot-assisted versus open kidney transplantation in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Angga Dewa Megatika Pratama, S. A. Shenelo, R. Kamila

Clinical transplantation and research, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background Obesity complicates open kidney transplantation (OKT), driving increasing interest in robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT). This study compared intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of RAKT and OKT in patients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. Methods Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were conducted through April 15, 2025. Four retrospective cohort studies (147 RAKT and 625 OKT cases) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses evaluated cold and warm ischemia times, estimated blood loss, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 months and 1 year, serum creatinine at 6 months and 3 years, delayed graft function (DGF), graft survival at 1 and 3 years, length of stay, rejection rate, 1-year patient survival, and surgical site infection (SSI) using a random-effects model. Results No significant differences were observed in cold ischemia time (mean difference [MD], 43.88 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], –88.06 to 175.82 minutes; P=0.51), warm ischemia time (MD, 3.21 minutes; 95% CI, –3.23 to 9.65 minutes; P=0.33), or estimated blood loss (MD, –41.30 mL; 95% CI, –95.60 to 12.99 mL; P=0.14). Other postoperative outcomes, including graft function (eGFR and creatinine), DGF, hospital stay, rejection, and 1-year survival, were also comparable. However, RAKT was associated with a significantly lower SSI incidence (risk ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04–0.45; P=0.0009). Conclusions In obese patients, RAKT yields outcomes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free