Evidence Hub

The Efficacy of an Alcohol-based Nasal Antiseptic versus Mupirocin or Iodophor for Preventing Surgical Site Infections - A Meta-analysis

Karen K. Hoffmann, Connie Steed, David Kremelberg, Richard P Wenzel

American Journal of Infection Control, 2024

16,212 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus is a proven strategy to reduce surgical site infections (SSI). Recently updated guidelines expanded nasal decolonization beyond traditionally high-risk populations to include the option for alcohol-based antiseptics (ABA). We assessed the efficacy of a novel ABA for reducing SSI compared to mupirocin and iodophor.

METHODS

A literature search in Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases was completed of studies reporting SSI outcomes in hospitals using an ABA. Primary meta-analyses were conducted to analyze ABA clinical efficacy versus no intervention (seven studies); sub-analyses compared the ABA to mupirocin (three studies) or iodophor (two studies).

RESULTS

147 nasal decolonization titles for SSI prevention were identified, of which seven were accepted. In the studies selected, 16,212 patients were included: 7983 (49.24%) control group, and 8129 (50.14%) intervention group. Significant effect sizes (measured as odds ratios [OR]) and z scores were found in all three meta-analyses: (OR = 3.178, z = 4.743, p < 0.001) in ABA clinical efficacy, (OR = 4.110, z = 3.167, p < 0.01), in ABA versus mupirocin, and (OR = 3.043, z = 3.155, p < 0.01) in ABA versus iodophor. Funnel plots for each demonstrated a lack of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant positive effects were identified in all three meta-analyses. An ABA appears to be a superior alternative to mupirocin or iodophors to reduce SSIs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 16,212 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free