Evidence Hub

Failure of scabies treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

L. Mbuagbaw, B. Sadeghirad, Rebecca L. Morgan, D. Mertz, Shahrzad Motaghi, M. Ghadimi, Ifeoluwa Babatunde, B. Zani et al.

British Journal of Dermatology, 2023

70 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment failure is considered as an important factor for the increase in scabies incidence over the last decade. However, the regional and temporal differences as well as predictors of therapy failure are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review of the prevalence of treatment failure in scabies patients and investigation of associated factors.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health and the Cochrane Central from inception to August 2021 for randomized and quasi-randomized trials, as well as observational studies that enrolled children or adults diagnosed with confirmed or clinical scabies treated with permethrin, ivermectin, crotamiton, benzyl benzoate, malathion, sulfur, or lindane, and measured treatment failure or factors associated with treatment failure. We performed random-effects meta-analysis for all outcomes reported by at least two studies.

RESULTS

147 studies were eligible. Overall prevalence of treatment failure was 15.2% (95% CI: 12.9 to 17.6; I2=95.3%, moderate certainty evidence) with regional differences between WHO Regions (P=0.003) being highest in the Western Pacific Region (26.9% [95% CI: 14.5 to 41.2]). Oral ivermectin (11.8% [95% CI: 8.4 to 15.4]), topical ivermectin (9.3% [95% CI: 5.1 to 14.3]) and permethrin (10.8% [95% CI: 7.5 to 14.5]) had relatively lower failure prevalence compared to the overall prevalence. Failure prevalence was lower in patients treated with two doses of oral ivermectin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free