Evidence Hub

Effects of Recreational Soccer on Anthropometric Measures, Metabolic Markers, Physical Fitness, and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents with Overweight/Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yilifaer Yilihemujiang, Chen-Qiu Wang, Li-Sha Hou, Feng-Yi Hu

Childhood Obesity, 2026

216 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review examined the effects of recreational soccer (RS) on anthropometric, metabolic, physical fitness, and mental health outcomes in youth with overweight/obesity.

METHODS

Following PRISMA 2020, this review searched seven databases, assessed quality with Cochrane RoB 2 and PEDro, performed meta-analysis in RevMan 5.4, used random-effects meta-analysis, and graded evidence certainty with GRADE.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed that RS was associated with significant reductions in BMI z-score [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.93 to -0.08, p = 0.02; k = 4, n = 147], waist circumference (WC) [mean difference (MD) = -8.60 cm, 95% CI: -11.98 to -5.23, p < 0.00001; k = 6, n = 176], systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = -4.21 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.92 to -0.51, p = 0.03; k = 7, n = 216), insulin (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.04, p = 0.03; k = 3, n = 119), total cholesterol (MD = -19.90 mg/dL, 95% CI: -30.33 to -9.47, p = 0.0002; k = 3, n = 119), high-density lipoprotein (MD = 8.36 mg/dL,95% CI: 4.80-11.91, p < 0.00001; k = 4, n = 132), low-density lipoprotein (MD = -14.13 mg/dL, 95% CI: -24.44 to -3.81, p = 0.007; k = 4, n = 119), and flexibility (sit and reach) (MD = 1.90 cm, 95% CI: 0.66-3.13, p = 0.003; k = 3, n = 94).

CONCLUSIONS

Regular RS participation improves anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes in children and adolescents with overweight/obesity, with robust evidence for reductions in WC and SBP. Findings…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 216 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free