Evidence Hub

Major approaches and results of clinical studies of the connection gut microbiota-brain and the effects of nutrients and microorganisms in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

I. Zotarelli, Durval Ribas, M. G. Duarte, Aline Damasceno de Avance, Handyara Gurtern Von Pettersen, Sylvia Renata Lannes Magalhães, Philipe Passos Fritegoto Pedrotti de Andrade, A. Rodrigues et al.

International Journal of Nutrology, 2026

20 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Schizophrenia (SZ) affects approximately 20 million individuals worldwide. The gut microbiota (GM) plays a fundamental role. Objective: It was to present, through a meta-analysis, the main considerations and outcomes of clinical studies on the relationship between the gut microbiota-brain axis in patients with schizophrenia, as well as to highlight the effects of nutrients, prebiotics, and probiotics for the improvement of symptoms of schizophrenia. Methods: The PRISMA rules for meta-analysis were followed. The research was carried out from November 2024 to January 2025 in the Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scielo databases, using scientific articles from 2009 to 2024. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias by the Cochrane (Funnel Plot). Results and Conclusion: It was founded 147 studies that underwent eligibility analysis. The final sample had 77 eligible studies and only 69 studies were described in the systematic review. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with I2 =15.7% <25%. The symmetrical funnel plot did not suggest a risk of bias among studies with small sample sizes. Altered gut microbiota composition was evidenced in people with obesity and chronic schizophrenia. The potential role of gut microbiota in schizophrenia is related to changes in brain structure and function. Intestinal serotonin production was potentially associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia. Furthermore,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free