Evidence Hub

A multi-dataset single-cell meta-analysis of human keloid skin across Asian, Black and White populations reveals endothelial and mesenchymal programs linked to ethnic disparities

Ziad Alkouz, Lian Zhang, Ala'a Al Suwait, Rehab Alhejairi, Chen-Mei Liu, Xiangyu Gu, Bin Yang

Frontiers in Medicine, 2026

Abstract

Introduction Keloid is a fibroproliferative scar with marked ethnic disparities, disproportionately affecting Asian and Black populations. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies have mapped keloid pathology, but cross-study differences complicate generalization. We performed a meta-analysis to identify composition and transcriptional programs associated with keloid across ethnicities. Methods We aggregated human skin scRNA-seq datasets containing keloid and healthy samples with documented ethnicity (Asian, Black, White). After quality control and batch integration (scVI/scANVI), we annotated cell types and subtypes. Differential abundance was estimated with scCODA, Milo, and propeller. Pseudobulk differential expression was meta-analyzed using random-effects models. Ligand-receptor signaling was inferred with CellChat/NicheNet. Results The harmonized atlas comprised 112 donors, 147 samples, and 487,293 cells from 8 studies. Keloid demonstrated higher proportions of vascular endothelial cells and fibroblasts across all methods. Ethnicity-stratified analysis revealed endothelial expansion in Asian and Black relative to White populations, while fibroblast expansion was greater in White keloids. Endothelial subtyping showed increased post-capillary venules and arteriolar states. Fibroblast analysis revealed expansion of mesenchymal/ADAM12+ and pro-inflammatory populations. Meta-analysis implicated TGF-β/SMAD, integrin/FAK, and YAP/TAZ mechanotransduction pathways as…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free