Anti-obesity medication for weight loss in early nonresponders to behavioral treatment: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend behavioral treatment (BT) as the first intervention for patients with obesity. However, a substantial minority (35–50%) do not achieve a clinically meaningful loss of ≥5%. Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are recommended when target weight loss is not achieved; however, their efficacy among BT nonresponders has not been established. This double-blind, randomized controlled proof-of-principle study evaluated whether augmenting BT with AOM improved 24-week weight loss compared to BT with placebo in early nonresponders to BT. A total of 147 adults with a body mass index ≥31 kg m−2 (≥28 kg m−2 with obesity-related comorbidity) completed an initial 4-week BT run-in. The 76 early nonresponders who lost <2.0% of initial weight were then randomized to 24 weeks of either BT plus placebo (BT + P, n = 38) or BT plus AOM (phentermine = 15.0 mg d−1, n = 38). Early responders received ongoing BT and were not part of the randomized trial. The primary outcome was met; early nonresponders assigned to BT + AOM had a greater mean (±s.e.) reduction in weight of 5.9 ± 0.7% from randomization to week 24, as compared to 2.8 ± 0.7% for those assigned to BT + P (mean difference = 3.1 ± 1.0, 95% confidence interval = 1.1–5.1%, Cohen’s d = 0.73, P = 0.003). Stepping up early BT nonresponders to BT + AOM improves their 24-week weight loss. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03779048. A randomized clinical trial showing the superiority of behavioral treatment plus…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 147 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.