Evidence Hub

Diabetes Body Project: Acute Effects of an Eating Disorder Prevention Program for Young Women With Type 1 Diabetes: A Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial

Mareille H. C. L. Hennekes, Severina Haugvik, M. de Wit, E. Toschi, C. Desjardins, T. Skrivarhaug, Knut Dahl-Jørgensen, Eric Stice et al.

Diabetes Care, 2024

147 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Young women with type 1 diabetes are at risk to develop eating disorders (ED). We evaluated a novel ED prevention program in a multinational randomized controlled trial.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Women (14-35 years old) with type 1 diabetes were randomized to virtual Diabetes Body Project groups or educational control. Outcomes were assessed at pretest and posttest (1-2 weeks after intervention).

RESULTS

Compared with educational controls (n = 146), participants in the Diabetes Body Project (n = 147) showed significant improvements (all P < 0.05), with small Cohen's d effect sizes for ED symptoms (d = -0.30, 95% CI -0.06, -0.69) (primary outcome), diabetes distress (d = -0.42), quality of life (d = 0.39) and dietary restraint (d = -0.31), and medium effect sizes for diabetes-specific disordered eating behaviors (d = -0.70), body dissatisfaction (d = -0.59), and pursuit of thin appearance ideal (d = -0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The Diabetes Body Project produced significantly larger acute effects with small to medium effect sizes compared with educational controls and has potential for broad implementation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free