Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of remote gamification pulmonary rehabilitation intervention based on the health action process approach theory in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Yu-Yu Jiang, Manyao Sun, Baiyila Nuerdawulieti, Xueying Huang, Yi Hou, Jiang Nan, Shiya Cui, Xun Nan

Frontiers in Medicine, 2025

159 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Background Remote pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is widely used in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but there is a problem of adherence. Health Action Process Theory (HAPA) is an effective behavior change theory, and combining it with gamification is expected to further improve PR adherence. This study explored the improvement effect of remote gamification PR intervention based on HAPA theory on rehabilitation adherence, clinical symptoms, quality of life and psychological outcome indicators of COPD patients, and compared it with self-efficacy theory and HAPA theory based remote PR. Methods 159 COPD patients were randomly divided into three groups: PR group, HAPA-PR group, and HAPA-gamification-PR (HAPA-Ga-PR) group. All three groups received 12 weeks of intervention and 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome indicators were quality of life of patients and PR adherence. Secondary outcome measures were dyspnea symptoms, exercise self-efficacy, exercise motivation and positive affect. Results A total of 147 patients completed the experiment. At the 12th week of intervention, there were statistically significant differences in PR adherence (p = 0.015), exercise self-efficacy (p = 0.039), exercise motivation (p = 0.008) and positive affect (p = 0.004) between the PR group and the HAPA-Ga-PR group. There were statistically significant differences in exercise motivation (p = 0.044) and positive affect (p = 0.046) between HAPA-PR group and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 159 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free