Evidence Hub

Elevated pretreatment serum IL-8 and PD-L1 and overall survival in a phase III randomized advanced pancreatic cancer clinical trial

A. Maddukuri, P. Moku, H. Polimera, V. Nagabhairu, Suhail M. Ali, K. Leitzel, J. Drabick, Scott Halstead et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2019

147 participants

Abstract

4131 Background: We previously reported the prognostic and predictive utility of pretreatment serum PD-L1 in the CCTG MA.31 serum bank (SABCS 2018, abstr PD3-10). IL-8 (CXCL8) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that binds to CXCR1 and CXCR2 and promotes tumor immune escape and progression. High serum IL-8 levels are associated with poor prognosis in many cancers, and have recently been reported to predict for reduced OS to nivolumab in lung cancer and melanoma (ASCO 2018, abstr #3025). In this study, we retrospectively evaluated combined pretreatment serum IL-8 and PD-L1 on overall survival (OS) from a phase III randomized pancreatic cancer trial of first-line therapy (octreotide + 5-FU vs. 5-FU) that had reported no significant OS difference between treatment arms. Methods: This study had 147 patients with serum available for this retrospective biomarker analysis from an advanced pancreatic cancer phase III clinical trial.TheELLA immunoassay platform (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA) was utilized to quantitate serum levels of IL-8 and PD-L1. Kaplan-Meier life table analysis was used to correlate serum biomarkers with overall survival (OS). Results: In univariate analysis, pretreatment serum IL-8 was a significant biomarker as a continuous variable (HR = 1.004; p = 0.012) and trended significant at the median cutpoint (HR = 1.379; p = 0.098) for OS, however serum PD-L1 was not significant at any cutpoint. When serum PD-L1 and IL-8 levels were analyzed as combined biomarkers (median…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free