Evidence Hub

Efficacy of acupuncture for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome among men with a sedentary lifestyle: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Shuai Gao, Yuanjie Sun, Li-Li Zhu, Shi-Yan Yan, Xin-Lu Wang, Xi Wang, Zhishun Liu

Acupuncture in Medicine, 2025

440 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Acupuncture was shown to be efficacious for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) in a prior randomized controlled trial (RCT). The purpose of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in the subgroup of CP/CPPS patients with a sedentary lifestyle and to compare outcomes between sedentary and non-sedentary participants in the group receiving acupuncture. Methods: In the original RCT, 440 patients with moderate to severe CP/CPPS received 20 sessions of acupuncture or sham acupuncture (SA) over 8 weeks and were followed up for 24 weeks after the treatment was completed. The primary outcome was the proportion of sustained responders, defined as those with a reduction of at least six points in the National Institute of Health—chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) total score at weeks 8, 20 and 32. In this secondary analysis, we compared n = 147 participants in the acupuncture group with a sedentary lifestyle group: (1) n = 148 participants with a sedentary lifestyle in the SA group ; and (2) n = 62 participants with a non-sedentary lifestyle in the acupuncture group. Results: Among those with a sedentary lifestyle, the proportion of sustained responders was 38.3% in the acupuncture group versus 20.1% in the SA group (odds ratio (OR) 2.52 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45–4.10]; P = 0.001). However, among those receiving verum acupuncture, response rates were higher in non-sedentary compared with sedentary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 440 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free