Evidence Hub

Can non-pharmacological interventions change levels of neurofilament light in older adults at risk of dementia? A secondary analysis of the SCD-Well randomized clinical trial

Lehané Masebo, T. Whitfield, H. Demnitz-King, A. Heslegrave, Géraldine Poisnel, Antoine Lutz, Eric Frison, M. Wirth et al.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025

147 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background Older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and/or elevated neurofilament light (NfL), a neurodegeneration biomarker, are at increased risk of dementia. Non-pharmacological interventions offer a promising strategy for reducing dementia risk, yet none have utilized NfL as a marker of response in dementia prevention trials. Objective To investigate the effects of two non-pharmacological interventions on NfL in older adults with SCD. Design SCD-Well was an 8-week observer-blinded, randomized, clinical trial with 6-month follow-up, and was a part of the Horizon 2020 European Union-funded "Medit-Ageing" project. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to August 2024. Setting Memory clinics at four sites in France, Germany, Spain, and UK. Participants Participants were enrolled from March 2017 to January 2018 after fulfilling SCD research criteria and performing within the normal range on cognitive testing. Of the 147 participants enrolled, 140 were included in this secondary analysis (7 did not consent to venipuncture). Interventions Participants were randomly allocated to the Caring Mindfulness-Based Approach for Seniors (CMBAS) intervention or a structurally matched Health Self-Management Program (HSMP). Measurements Plasma NfL was measured at baseline (V1), post-intervention (V2), and 6-month follow-up (V3), using Single molecule array technology, and log-transformed for analyses. Results 137 older adults with SCD provided NfL data (mean [SD] age: 72.7 [6.8]…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free