Evidence Hub

Digital Mindfulness Intervention for Pregnant Women With Affective Disorders and Acute Stress Reactions: Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Kathrin Hassdenteufel, M. Müller, J. Multmeier, Harald Abele, S. Brucker, S. Zipfel, J. Graf, A. Bauer et al.

Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2026

5,299 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Pregnant women with ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) affective or stress-related disorders face an elevated risk of perinatal depression and anxiety, yet evidence on digital nonpharmacologic interventions for this population remains limited. Objective This study evaluated the effectiveness of an 8-week digital mindfulness–based intervention (eMBI) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) among pregnant women with ICD-10 affective or stress-related disorders participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods This prespecified secondary analysis was conducted within a multicenter RCT in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Pregnant women aged 18 years and older with elevated depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS]>9) and ICD-10–diagnosed affective or stress-related disorders were randomized 1:1 to eMBI or TAU. The intervention consisted of 8 weekly app-based mindfulness sessions (45 min each) delivered during gestational weeks 29‐36, with no direct therapist contact. The primary outcome was continuous depressive symptom severity measured with the EPDS at 4‐6 weeks post partum. Secondary outcomes included the EPDS at 6 months post partum, generalized anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State [STAI-S], State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait [STAI-T]), and Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised (PRAQ-R). Analyses followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, using mixed models…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 5,299 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free