Evidence Hub

Association between basal platelet count and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure: a secondary analysis from the eICU collaborative research database

Chuan Xiao, Zuo-An Qin, Jingjing Xiao, Yumei Cheng, Qing Li, Wei Li, Tianhui He, Shu-Wen Li et al.

American journal of translational research, 2021

26,961 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the correlation between platelet count and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) is limited. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate whether platelet count was associated with all-cause mortality in critical patients with ARF by using the electronic intensive care unit (eICU) Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD).

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, the data of 26961 patients with ARF hospitalized in ICUs between 2014 and 2015 were collected. The independent variable was log2 basal platelet count, and the dependent variables were all-cause in-hospital and ICU mortality. Covariates including demographic data, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV score, supportive treatment, and comorbidities were collected.

RESULTS

In the fully adjusted model, log2 basal platelet count was negatively associated with all-cause mortality both in hospital [RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.91] and in ICU [RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.92]. A non-linear relationship between log2 basal platelet count and all-cause in-hospital and ICU mortality was identified by the nonlinearity test. The inflection points we got were 6.83 and 6.86 respectively (after inverse log2 logarithmic conversion, the platelet counts were 114×109/L and 116×109/L, respectively). On the right side of the inflection point, however, no association was observed between blood platelets and all-cause in-hospital (RR:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 26,961 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free