Anti-PD-1 antibody penpulimab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind phase 3 study
Abstract
In this phase 3 trial, penpulimab combined with chemotherapy was assessed against a regimen of placebo plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC). 291 patients were randomised and allocated in a 1:1 ratio in order to receive penpulimab (n = 144; 200 mg) or placebo (n = 147; 200 mg), plus chemotherapy (cisplatin/carboplatin and gemcitabine) every 3 weeks. Patients followed by maintenance therapy with penpulimab or placebo after 6 cycles. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST v1.1, and a significantly longer median PFS in the penpulimab arm versus the placebo arm (9.63 versus 7.00 months; hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI: 0.33–0.62, P < 0.0001) was demonstrated in this prespecified interim analysis. The key secondary endpoint was the overall survival (OS). However, the OS data were still immature, and the median OS was not achieved (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.63–1.40). The occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥ 3) was 89.0% and 85.9% in two arms, with the most common being reduced the quantity of neutrophil (56.2% vs. 62.0%), reduced the quantity of white blood cell (54.1% vs. 54.9%), and anemia (45.2% vs. 38.7%). In the penpulimab arm, 6 patients (4.1%) experienced immune-related adverse events (grade ≥ 3). Adding penpulimab to chemotherapy led to a notable enhancement in PFS for the first-line R/M NPC treatment, alongside a safety profile that…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 291 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.