Evidence Hub

Real-World Outcomes in Patients with COPD Initiating Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate After Dual and Triple Therapy in Spain: A Sub-Study of the ORESTES Study

J. Figueira-Gonçalves, B. Alcázar-Navarrete, Raquel Casitas-Mateo, Jessica González, C. Gotera-Rivera, Alberto Herrejón-Silvestre, Juan Margallo-Iribarnegaray, Marta Martín-Lana et al.

Pulmonary Therapy, 2026

295 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive lung condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT), such as budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF), is recommended for patients with COPD who are not adequately controlled by dual therapy (DT). Escalation from DT or switching from triple therapy (TT)—SITT or multiple-inhaler TT (MITT)—are key real-world treatment pathways. Methods The observational, retrospective, multicenter ORESTES study included adults (≥ 40 years) with COPD initiating BGF in routine clinical practice. This secondary analysis focuses on the following treatment pathways: escalation from DT and switch from TT. Patients’ characteristics, exacerbations, additional COPD treatments, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) were assessed. Results A total of 295 patients escalated from DT and 356 switched from TT (SITT: 147; MITT: 209) to BGF. 66.8% of patients escalating from DT and 78.5% switching from TT showed a high-risk GesEPOC phenotype; 77.9% and 80.0% had mMRC grade ≥ 2, and 91.2% and 96.1% had ≥ 3 comorbidities. Following BGF initiation, the annualized exacerbation rate decreased by 11.6% (from 1.06 to 0.94) in patients escalating from DT and by 15.5% (from 1.60 to 1.35) in patients switching from TT (after SITT: 17.8% reduction; after MITT: 14.1%). Rescue medication use declined overall, and specifically short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) use declined by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 295 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free