Evidence Hub

Differential PTSD Symptom Cluster Profiles by Trauma Exposure Modality in Community-Dwelling Vietnamese Older Adults

Bích Thị Ngọc Phạm, Le-Xuan Hung, Ho Thi Kim Thanh

F1000Research, 2026

130 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background PTSD in community-dwelling older adults remains under-recognized in post-conflict, low- and middle-income countries such as Vietnam, where mental health services have predominantly targeted direct trauma survivors. Whether distinct PTSD symptom cluster profiles emerge across different exposure modalities has not been examined. Methods This cross-sectional secondary analysis used data from the Vietnam Health and Aging Study (VHAS, 2021–2022). Of 296 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 with documented trauma exposure, 147 with complete Criterion A subtype data were classified as any direct exposure (n = 130) and indirect-only exposure (n = 17). PCL-5 cluster scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Logistic regression adjusted for cumulative trauma burden examined whether exposure modality predicted clinical PTSD (PCL-5 ≥ 11). Results Total PCL-5 scores did not differ significantly between the indirect-only and any direct exposure groups (mean 8.82 ± 12.98 vs. 5.10 ± 9.68; U = 997.5, p = 0.467). In exploratory cluster-level comparisons, only Avoidance (Cluster C) differed significantly (mean 1.35 ± 2.09 vs. 0.56 ± 1.53; U = 826.5, p = 0.013). The proportion meeting clinical PTSD threshold was higher in the indirect-only group (41.2% vs. 17.7%; OR = 3.26, 95% CI: 1.12–9.45). After adjustment for cumulative trauma burden, the association persisted (AOR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.16–10.00, p = 0.025). Conclusions Among community-dwelling older Vietnamese adults,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 130 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free