Identification of a Cytokine Biomarker for Prognostic Modeling of Breast Cancer–Related Lymphedema
Abstract
Abstract Lymphedema is a chronic complication of breast cancer treatment, and early intervention is crucial to reduce morbidity. This study evaluated the role of blood-based cytokine biomarkers in the prognostication of breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL) to improve risk prediction. A secondary analysis of inflammatory biomarkers for BCRL was performed using a previously published cohort of 147 patients with breast cancer who had undergone serum cytokine profiling during their treatment at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from 2010 to 2014. Prognostic cytokine variables for lymphedema were selected by regression analysis and independence from known clinical risk factors. Regression-based modeling was employed to integrate prognostic variables for the prediction of lymphedema occurrence. We identified the immunostimulatory cytokine IFNα2A as a potential biomarker for lymphedema development [OR, 3.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–9.51; P = 0.042], independent from known clinical risk factors. Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated 3-year lymphedema-free survival of 95% (90%–100%) versus 85% (77%–94%) for below versus above median concentrations of IFNα2A (P = 0.026). In combination with an established clinical risk regression-based model, patients identified as high risk based on clinical factors alone were able to be correctly reclassified as low risk by IFNα2A in 31% (eight of 26) of cases. Our combined logistic regression model using both IFNα2A and…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 147 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.