Adjuvant lenvatinib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with high risk of postoperative recurrence: A multicenter prospective cohort study
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The high recurrent rate after surgery hinders the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as an adjuvant therapy in HCC patients with high risk of recurrence.
METHODS
Patients were enrolled from eight hepatobiliary centers in China. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Additionally, propensity score matching (PSM) and other three propensity score analyses were performed to balance the potential baseline bias to validate the conclusion. The adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03838796).
RESULTS
A total of 297 patients were enrolled, with 147 in the LEN + TACE group and 150 in the TACE group. Before PSM, the LEN + TACE group achieved significantly better DFS than the TACE group (19.0 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.011). PSM analysis identified 111 matched pairs. After PSM, the LEN + TACE group also showed better DFS (19.0 vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.018). Other three propensity score analyses yielded similar DFS benefit tendency. Furthermore, favorable OS was also obtained in the LEN + TACE group before PSM. Lenvatinib related AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 28.6 % of the patients in the LEN + TACE group.
CONCLUSIONS
Adjuvant lenvatinib plus TACE might be a promising adjuvant approach…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 297 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.