Evidence Hub

Association of Preoperative Frailty and Post-Induction Hypotension in Elderly Patients Undergoing Major Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Jia-Wen Yu, Lu Che, Ruoxi Wang, Que-Xuan Cui, Li Xu, Yu-Guang Huang

Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2025

147 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Purpose Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is one of the most common complications during general anesthesia, especially in elderly patients. Frailty, which describes age-related decrease of physiological capacity with increased susceptibility to stress, may be associated with PIH, when stress is brought by anesthetics. This study aimed to explore the association between preoperative frailty and PIH as well as postoperative complications. Patients and Methods This study was a prospective observational cohort study. Elderly patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia were recruited from December 2019 to April 2022 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Preoperative frailty was assessed by FRAIL scale. The primary outcome was post-induction hypotension. Secondary outcome included postoperative complications, functional recovery, length of stay and hospital cost. Results A total of 147 patients were included in the final analysis, of which 25 (17.0%) were considered frail. Frailty patients were generally older and suffered more from anemia, hypoalbuminemia, weakness, and orthostatic hypotension. The incidence of PIH was significantly higher in frail patients than non-frail elderly (80.0% vs 37.7%). Multivariable analysis revealed that frailty was associated with higher risk of PIH (aRR 1.72, 95% CI 1.20–2.47, P=0.003) after adjusting for baseline characteristics, surgical type and intraoperative medications. Comprehensive complication index…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free