Evidence Hub

Tumor budding in pre-neoadjuvant biopsy and post-neoadjuvant resection specimens is associated with poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma—a cohort study of 147 cases by modified ITBCC criteria

Gaohua Wu, Rong-Kui Luo, Qianhui Xu, Liuxiao Yang, H. Xia, V. Chew, Y. Koh, K. Chang et al.

Virchows Archiv, 2024

6 citations

Abstract

Tumor budding (TB) has been associated with poor survival in a variety of cancers including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). As tumor histomorphological features are significantly altered after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), our study aims to assess the prognostic significance of TB in iCCA patients before and after NAT, by the modified International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) criteria. 147 NAT-treated iCCA cases were included in this study. In biopsy specimens obtained before NAT, the TB-positive subgroup had lower overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis (P = 0.010). In resection specimens obtained after NAT, the TB-positive subgroup had reduced OS (P = 0.002) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.013) in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis including TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion, TB-positive in post-NAT resection was also found as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS (OS, HR, 3.005; 95% CI, 1.333–6.775, P = 0.008; RFS, HR, 1.748; 95% CI, 1.085–2.816, P = 0.022). In conclusion, assessing the presence of TB by modified ITBCC criteria provides robust prognostic information in the NAT setting of iCCA patients and can be considered to be included in routine pathological reporting.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free