Evidence Hub

Perioperative Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist Use and Rates of Pseudarthrosis After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study

Vedant Agrawal, S. Amasa, Mert Karabacak, K. Margetis

Neurosurgery, 2024

712 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pseudarthrosis is a common surgical complication after arthrodesis and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The association between glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist use and pseudarthrosis is yet to be explored. This study aims to examine the association of GLP-1 agonists with rates of pseudarthrosis in patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion.

METHODS

This national multicenter cohort study used data spanning from June 19, 2010, to June 19, 2024, from the global health network TriNetX. One-to-one propensity score matching for age, sex, race, comorbidities, body mass index, and A1c was conducted to balance cohorts. The rates of pseudarthrosis were then assessed within the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postsurgical follow-up periods.

RESULTS

A total of 37 147 patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion (mean [SD] age, 59.3 [13.5] years; 47.7% men and 52.3% women) were enrolled in the study. Among these, 712 individuals (1.9%) were identified as GLP-1 agonist users. After propensity score matching, there were 709 patients in each cohort. Patients who took a GLP-1 agonist had lower odds of developing pseudarthrosis 6 months [odds ratio (OR): 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51-0.96], 1 year [OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.91], and 2 years (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.91) after a posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort study, patients who were prescribed GLP-1 agonists in the perioperative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 712 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free