Evidence Hub

The impact of different classes of lupus nephritis on maternal and fetal outcomes: a cohort study of 147 pregnancies

B. Rodrigues, M. Lacerda, G. de Jesus, Flávia Cunha dos Santos, N. de Jesus, R. A. Levy, E. Klumb

Lupus, 2019

54 participants · 31 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the impact of different classes of lupus nephritis as risk variables for maternal and fetal adverse outcomes in a cohort of pregnant lupus patients. Methods This is a cohort study with retrospective and prospective data collection, conducted at the University Hospital of State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 2011 to 2016. A total of 147 pregnancies of 137 systemic lupus erythematosus patients of whom 66 had lupus nephritis were included. Demographic and clinical features, as well as maternal and fetal outcomes were observed for each nephritis histological class among systemic lupus erythematosus patients and compared with those without nephritis. Categorical variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies and numerical variables as means and standard deviation. The chi-square test with Fisher's correction and Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis. A pvalue < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Systemic lupus erythematosus patients with proliferative nephritis (classes III/IV, n = 54) presented more frequent disease flares (p = 0.02), continuous active disease during pregnancy and puerperium (p = 0.006), hospitalization due to systemic lupus erythematosus (p < 0.001), hospitalization not directly associated to systemic lupus erythematosus (p = 0.04), higher frequency of cesarean delivery (p = 0.03) and preeclampsia (p = 0.01) than patients without nephritis. Permanent damage measured by Systemic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 54 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free