Evidence Hub

Birth prevalence of anorectal malformations in England and 5-year survival: a national birth cohort study

K. Ford, M. Peppa, A. Zylbersztejn, J. Curry, R. Gilbert

Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2022

3,325 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Objective To determine the birth prevalence, maternal risk factors and 5-year survival for isolated and complex anorectal malformations. Design National birth cohort using hospital admission data and death records. Setting All National Health Service England hospitals. Patients Live-born singletons delivered from 2002 through 2018, with evidence in the first year of life of a diagnosis of an anorectal malformation and repair during a hospital admission, or anorectal malformation recorded on the death certificate. Cases were further classified as isolated or complex depending on the presence of additional anomalies. Main outcome measures Birth prevalence of anorectal malformations per 10 000 live births, risk ratios for isolated and complex anorectal malformation by maternal, infant and birth characteristics, and 5-year survival. Results We identified 3325 infants with anorectal malformations among 9 474 147 live-born singletons; 61.7% (n=2050) of cases were complex. Birth prevalence was 3.5 per 10 000 live births (95% CI 3.4 to 3.6). Complex anorectal malformations were associated with maternal age extremes after accounting for other sociodemographic factors. Compared with maternal ages 25–34 years, the risk of complex anorectal malformations was 31% higher for ≥35 years (95% CI 17 to 48) and 13% higher for ≤24 years (95% CI 0 to 27). Among 2376 anorectal malformation cases (n=1450 complex) born from 2002 through 2014, 5-year survival was lower for complex (86.9%; 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,325 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free