Evidence Hub

Distinguishing Between Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome, Associated With COVID-19 in Children and the Kawasaki Disease: Development of Preliminary Criteria Based on the Data of the Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

M. Kostik, L. Bregel, I. Avrusin, E. Dondurei, A. Matyunova, O. Efremova, E. Isupova, T. Kornishina et al.

Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2021

147 participants · 41 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnostic between multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 in children (MIS-C) and Kawasaki disease (KD) can make difficulties due to many similarities. Our study aimed to create a Kawasaki/MIS-C differentiation score (KMDscore) allowing discrimination of MIS-C and KD. Study design: The retrospective multicenter cohort study included clinical, laboratory, and instrumental information about MIS-C (n = 72) and KD (n = 147). The variables allowed to discriminate both conditions used to construct and validate the diagnostic score called the KMDscore. Results: Patients with MIS-C were older, had earlier admission to the hospital, had a shorter time before fever resolution, two times frequently had signs of GI and CNS involvement observed, and had more impressive thrombocytopenia, higher level of CRP, ferritin, ALT, AST, LDH, creatinine, triglycerides, troponin, and D-dimer compared to KD patients. Respiratory signs in MIS-C were presented with pleuritis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, oxygen dependency, lung infiltration, and ground-glass opacities in CT. The heart involvement with fast progression of myocarditis provided the severity of MIS-C and ICU admission due to 12 times higher arterial hypotension or shock and required cardiotonic. No differences in the frequency of CA lesions were seen in the majority of cases. Five criteria, CRP >11 mg/dl (18 points), D-dimer >607 ng/ml (27 points), age >5 years (30 points), thrombocytopenia (25…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free