Crossed Screw Fixation Versus Dorsal Plating for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Multiple fixation techniques for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis have been described with an average fusion rate of 93.5%. This retrospective cohort study assesses the association between crossed screws (vs dorsal plating) and medical comorbidities and the outcome radiographic union. Bivariate tests of association and multivariable logistic regression were employed to assess differences across fixation type and outcomes. We identified 305 patients who underwent a first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis during the study period. Crossed screw fixation was used in 158 (51.8%) patients while dorsal plating (tubular or anatomic locking plate) was used in 147 (48.2%) patients. Dorsal plating was utilized more often in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p = .019) and history of smoking (p = .044). At 12 weeks post-operatively there were no significant differences in fusion rates between the two groups (crossed screw group = 95.3% vs dorsal plate group (referent) = 93.5%, Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-4.26). Not smoking was associated with a greater odds of fusion at 12 weeks (96.2% for nonsmokers vs 75.0% for smokers (referent), AOR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.28). Lower body mass index was associated with a greater odds of fusion at 12 weeks (AOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99). Surgeons allowed weightbearing earlier with dorsal plate fixation (2 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 2.6) versus 5 weeks (IQR 2.6) for crossed screw fixation, p =…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 305 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.