Evidence Hub

Near normalization of peripheral blood markers in HIV-infected patients on long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy: a case-control study

Óscar Brochado-Kith, Isidoro Martínez, J. Berenguer, L. Medrano, J. González-García, Pilar Garcia-Broncano, M. Jiménez-Sousa, A. Carrero et al.

AIDS (London), 2020

22 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the differences in peripheral blood markers between HIV well-controlled patients on long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy (HIV-group) and age-matched healthy controls (HC), to evaluate the benefits of virological suppression in those patients.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study in 22 subjects in HIV-group and 14 in HC-group. RNA-seq analysis was performed from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Peripheral blood T-cell subsets were evaluated by flow cytometry and plasma biomarkers by immunoassays. All p-values were corrected by the false discovery rate (FDR, q-values).

RESULTS

Only the serine/arginine repetitive matrix 4 (SRRM4) gene, which is involved in alternative RNA splicing events, was differentially expressed between HIV and HC groups (q-value≤0.05 and fold-change≥2). However, 147 differentially expressed genes were found with a more relaxed threshold (p-value≤0.05 and fold-change≥1.5), of which 67 genes with values of variable importance in projection (VIP)≥1 were selected for pathway analysis. We found that six ribosomal genes represented significant Ribosome-related pathways, all of them downregulated in the HIV-group, which may be a strategy to facilitate viral production. T-cells subset and plasma biomarkers did not show significant differences after FDR correction (q-value> 0.05), but a non-corrected analysis showed higher values of CD4 Treg cells (CD4CD25CD127), MCP-1, and sVEGF-R1 in the HIV-group (p-value≤0.05).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free