Evidence Hub

Excessive polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in 147 care homes: a cross-sectional study

C. MacRae, D. Henderson, S. Mercer, J. Burton, Nicosha De Souza, Paula Grill, C. Marwick, B. Guthrie

BJGP open, 2021

1,444 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

Background Care home residents often have multiple cognitive and physical impairments, and are at high risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Aim To describe excessive polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing predisposing care home residents to ADEs. Design & setting A cross-sectional analysis of all dispensed prescriptions for 147 care home residents in Tayside and Fife, Scotland. Method Prevalence of excessive polypharmacy was examined using multilevel logistic regression, by modelling associations between individual and care home predictors with excessive polypharmacy (≥10 drugs). Prescribing of drugs known to increase the risk of eight clinically important ADE categories was examined. Drugs prescribed within each ADE category, for each resident, were counted. Results In total, 32.3% (n = 1444/4468) of residents had excessive polypharmacy, which was more common in residents aged 70–74 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04 to 3.34) and 80–84 years (aOR 1.75, 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.02), living in a residential care home (aOR 1.50, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.88), and located in Fife (aOR 1.37, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.71). Excessive polypharmacy was less common in residents with dementia (aOR 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.84), and 8.9% (95% CI = 5.9% to 11.6%) of the variation was attributable to care home predictors. Potentially inappropriate prescribing of ≥2 drugs was seen across all ADE categories, with highest prevalence seen in drugs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,444 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free