Evidence Hub

The Association between Healthy Beverage Index and Healthy and Unhealthy Obesity Phenotypes among Obese Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

Niloufar Rasaei, D. Hosseininasab, Farideh Shiraseb, Fatemeh Gholami, Sahar Noori, Rasool Ghaffarian-Ensaf, E. Daneshzad, C. Clark et al.

International journal of clinical practice, 2022

210 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background. Metabolic phenotypes are new dimensions of obesity. Two important types of these phenotypes are metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO). Studies showed that the components of the healthy beverage index (HBI) such as sugar‐sweetened beverages (SSBs), milk, and fruit juices might have an association with MHO and MUO phenotypes. Methods. This cross‐sectional study was performed on 210 women with the age range of 18–65 years and a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2. The age range of the study population was the main inclusion criterion. Dietary intakes were assessed using a 147‐item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), as well as biochemistry and anthropometric parameters, in all participants. Metabolic health phenotypes were considered using the Karelis score, whilst HBI was evaluated based on 8 categories of beverages consumed. Analysis was carried out using binary logistic regression. Result. After controlling for a wide variety of confounding variables such as age, energy intake, BMI, education, physical activity, marriage, economic status, job, and supplementation, we found that the participants in the highest tertile of HBI had a lower risk of abnormal metabolic status than those in the lowest tertile (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.07–3.21; P trend: 0.04), and it was not statistically significant, but we saw a significant trend. Conclusion. In conclusion, it seems that higher adherence to HBI can minimize the risk of metabolic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 210 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free