Evidence Hub

The association of dietary acid load with resting metabolic rate and metabolic components in overweight and obese women: A cross sectional study

Atieh Mirzababaei, Farideh Shiraseb, L. Setayesh, A. Tavakoli, E. Daneshzad, Faezeh Abaj, Cain C. T. Clark, K. Mirzaei

Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2021

375 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several epidemiologic studies have reported that dietary acid load (DAL) is associated with metabolic profiles; however, to our knowledge, the relationship of this dietary pattern with resting metabolic rate (RMR) among obese and overweight females remains unreported. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association of DAL, RMR and metabolic components among overweight and obese adult women.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 375 Iranian adult women, aged 18-48 years. DAL indices were calculated by using a validated 147-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Biochemical and anthropometric measures were assessed using standard methods. An impedance fat analyzer was used to obtain the body composition and an indirect calorimeter was used to assess the RMR.

RESULT

It was observed that after correction for potential confounders, net endogenous acid production (NEAP) and potential renal acid load (PRAL) scores were inversely associated with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (P < 0.05). NEAP index was inversely associated with RMR (β = -0.44, 95% confidence interval; CI = -1.21 to 0.32, P = 0.02), and positively associated with waist circumference (WC) (β = 1.04, 95% CI = -1.05 to 4.45, P = 0.06) and waist to hip ratio (WHR) (β = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.04, P = 0.04), such that subjects with higher scores in NEAP had lower RMR and higher WC and WHR. We also observed that NEAP (β = -0.44, 95% CI = -1.21 to 0.32, P = 0.02) was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 375 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free