Evidence Hub

Antibiotic-Resistant Spondylodiscitis With Canal Invasion and Aggressive Evolution to Epidural Abscess: A Case Series of Spontaneous Occurrence in 16 Patients

P. Rosinsky, Shay Mandler, N. Netzer, Meital Ady, Danielle Elmaliache, S. Sagiv, P. Ben-Galim

The International Journal of Spine Surgery, 2018

16 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for spondylodiscitis, its failure rates, and the need for surgical intervention. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients who presented with spontaneous deep spinal infections and spondylodiscitis between 2011 and 2013. Clinical, bacteriologic, and radiographic data during hospitalization were analyzed. Results: A total of 16 patients presented with deep spinal infections during the study period; 15 of them presented with spontaneous pyogenic spondylodiscitis, and 1 presented with epidural abscess. Median age was 68 years (range, 50–80 years), and 6 (38%) were healthy young laborers. None of the patients were immunocompromised. On admission all patients presented with pain, there was fever in 3 patients (19%), and there was elevated blood C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, with a mean of 147 ± 83.1 mg/L, 11.65 ± 5.6 × 103/μL, 93.6 ± 35.1 mm/h, respectively. A total of 15 patients (94%) developed infections that were refractory to appropriate culture-specific intravenous antibiotic treatment (mean, 10.2 days); 8 patients (50%) deteriorated neurologically and required wide surgical decompression. Complications included widespread epidural free gas in 2 patients (12%), multiple bilateral psoas abscesses in 2 patients (12%), kyphotic segmental instability in 4 patients (25%), and inferior vena cava septic thrombi in 1 patient (6%). A…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free