Evidence Hub

END Organ Disease in the Context of Human Herpes VIRUS 6 Viremia in Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic STEM CELL Transplant Patients: A Case Series

Lena E. Winestone, R. Agarwal, J. G. Montoya, K. Weinberg, M. Porteus, B. Pinsky, E. Soda, J. Waggoner et al.

2014

92 participants

Abstract

s / Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 20 (2014) S211eS256 S255 hours later. Because avoidance of stem cell exposure to CY occurs only in the 2 step approach, we compared engraftment rates and IR between the 2 groups. All 92 patients had good risk disease. In the 1 step vs the 2 step study, median time to ANC > 500/ul was 19(range 15-28 days) vs 11[range 9-16 days (p1⁄40.000-Mann-Whitney)], and for platelets > 20,000/ul, 29(range 18-52 days) vs 17(range 12-173 days) respectively (ns). The significant difference in time to ANC recovery in the 1 step group was possibly from the exposure of the donor PBSC’s to CY. When we accounted for the later occurrence of day 0 in the 2 step group, the median time to ANC recovery was still 3 days longer in the 1 step group even though this group received a higher median CD 34 dose. Possibly due to the earlier count recovery in the 2-step group, the median CD3/4 count at day 28 was 20(range 5-50/ul) in the 1 step group vs 54(range 11-299/ul) in the 2 step group. By day 90, differences between the groups resolved, with a median CD3/4 count of 157(range 29-397/ul) vs 147(range 10-814/ul) in the 1 and 2 step groups respectively. Median CD3/8 count at day 28 was 40 (range 3-157/ul) vs 57 (range 4-2682/ul) and at day 90 was 239(range 12-1439/ul) vs 204(range 2-2379/ul) in the 1 and 2 step groups respectively. The percentages of patients on steroids for GVHD at day 28 (13% in the 1 step group vs 31%) and 90 (18% vs 33%) was not significantly different…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 92 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free