Evidence Hub

Neuroendocrine tumor of the duodenojejunal flexure: Role of 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET-CT and oncologic implications of nodal metastasis-A case report

Supreet Kumar, Aishwarya Bhalerao, Parul Sobti, Sonam Gupta, Vivek Tandon, D. Govil

International journal of surgery case reports, 2025

Abstract

Introduction and importance Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the duodenojejunal (D-J) flexure are exceptionally rare and diagnostically challenging due to their anatomical obscurity and non-functional presentation. This report highlights the diagnostic value of 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET-CT in accurately localizing a non-functional, low-grade NET at the D-J flexure, which was undetected by conventional modalities. Case presentation A 52-year-old woman was referred after incidental detection of a proximal jejunal mass on CT urography during evaluation for recurrent urinary tract infections. Endoscopy and enteroscopy failed to visualize the lesion. 18F-FDG PET-CT showed no significant uptake, but 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET-CT revealed intense somatostatin receptor avidity (SUVmax 147) at the D-J flexure. Surgical exploration confirmed a 2.3 cm G2 NET with 1 of 36 lymph nodes positive for metastasis. The patient recovered uneventfully and is under surveillance. Clinical discussion This case underscores the diagnostic blind spot posed by the D-J flexure and the limitations of standard imaging and endoscopy. Despite being small and low-grade, the tumor exhibited nodal spread, reinforcing the need for comprehensive oncologic resection. 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET-CT proved indispensable for localization and planning. Conclusion Even small, well-differentiated NETs in rare anatomical sites such as the D-J flexure can harbour nodal metastasis. High suspicion, functional imaging, and formal surgical resection…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free