Evidence Hub

Therapeutic management of uterine tumours resembling ovarian sex cord tumours including a focus on fertility: A systematic review

M. Shibahara, Tomoko Kurita, Hiroshi Harada, Yojiro Tsuda, Masanori Hisaoka, K. Yoshino

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 2024

147 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Uterine tumours resembling ovarian sex cord tumours (UTROSCTs) are extremely rare. To date, most patients with UTROSCTs have undergone hysterectomy and had a benign clinical course. Fertility-preserving surgery should be considered because some patients with UTROSCTs are aged < 40 years. This paper reviews the treatment and prognosis for patients with UTROSCTs, with a focus on fertility.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE and Scopus were searched systematically for case reports and case series of UTROSCTs published in English from inception to December 2022, and initial treatment and recurrence rates were compared. The following data were extracted: age; symptoms; initial therapy; metastasis at diagnosis; disease-free survival (DFS); and recurrence.

RESULTS

In total, 147 patients (72 studies) reporting the clinical course of UTROSCTs were analysed. The median age at diagnosis was 50 years, and 28 (19.0 %) patients were aged < 40 years. Most patients (n = 125, 85.0 %) underwent hysterectomy as the initial surgery, with a recurrence rate of 17.6 % (n = 22). The recurrence rate was 30 % (n = 6) in patients who underwent mass resection (n = 20). Among the 15 patients who underwent mass resection aged < 40 years, seven went on to achieve pregnancy (46.7 %) and six had successful deliveries (40.0 %). No significant differences in 5- and 10-year DFS were found between the hysterectomy and mass resection groups (p = 0.123 and 0.0612, respectively). Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free