Evidence Hub

P-837. Effect of Clinical Guideline Implementation on Use of Plasma Microbial Cell-free DNA Sequencing Testing at an Academic Medical Center

T. V. Van Schooneveld, Tess A. Karre, Jonathan H. Ryder

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2026

142 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background The role and timing of plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) testing is unknown. We created a guideline for use arranged by clinical syndrome and evaluated changes in testing, results, and impact on patient care pre- and post-guideline. Table 1: Population Demographics Table 2: Clinical Impact of mcfDNA Testing Methods The stewardship program created a clinical guideline with input from microbiology and ID providers regarding use and timing of mcfDNA testing. It was published online 3/2024 with accompanying brief education to ID. We compared mcfDNA testing pre- (4/2023-2/2024) and post-guideline (3/2024-12/2024). Testing appropriateness was assessed based on institutional guidance. Indication for testing, clinical significance and impact was determined using clinical documentation. Results A total of 147 mcfDNA tests were ordered on 142 patients with demographics in Table 1. Most tests were in immunocompromised patients. Testing increased slightly post-guideline (4.3 vs. 5.2 tests/10000 PD). mcfDNA tests were positive in 75% tested for a median of 2 pathogens with at least some results confirmed by other testing in 41% (Table 2). Post-guideline testing for Other and Respiratory diagnoses decreased but testing by Oncology ID increased (16.9% vs. 39.5%) with a 6-fold increase in use for suspected Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI) (4.2% vs. 23.7%). Only 23% of mcfDNA tests were considered clinically significant by providers (pre- 26.7% vs. 20.0% post-).…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free