Phenotype validation of the Korean working group on sarcopenia guideline
Abstract
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to validate the proposed Korean Working Group on Sarcopenia (KWGS) guideline, which introduces the concept of functional sarcopenia, in older Korean adults.
METHODS
Data from the Aging Study of Pyeongchang Rural Area, a longitudinal cohort of community-dwelling older adults, were utilized to compare frailty status and institutionalization-free survival among participants according to sarcopenia status. Based on the KWGS guideline, severe sarcopenia was defined as low muscle mass and strength with slow gait speed; sarcopenia (not severe) was defined as low muscle mass with low muscle strength or slow gait speed; and functional sarcopenia was defined as low muscle strength and slow gait speed without low muscle mass.
RESULTS
Among the 1302 participants, 329 (25.3 %) had severe sarcopenia, 147 (11.3 %) had sarcopenia (not severe), and 277 (21.3 %) had functional sarcopenia. Frailty was significantly greater in participants with any phenotype of sarcopenia than in those without sarcopenia. Additionally, participants with functional sarcopenia were frailer than those with sarcopenia (not severe). Furthermore, the rates of institutionalization and mortality were higher in participants with any phenotype of sarcopenia than in those without sarcopenia. There was no statistical difference between the rates of sarcopenia (not severe) and those with functional sarcopenia. These findings remained consistent after adjusting for age and sex.
CONCLUSIONS
Each…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,302 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.