Evidence Hub

Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Elderly Patients is Associated with an Exaggerated Neutrophilic Pro-Inflammatory Response to Pathogenic Bacteria

Justin C. Morse, Ping Li, K. Ely, M. Shilts, Todd J. Wannemuehler, Li-Ching Huang, Quanhu Sheng, Naweed I. Chowdhury et al.

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2018

147 participants · 72 citations

Abstract

Background Potential effects of aging on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) pathophysiology have not been well defined but might have important ramifications given a rapidly aging US and world population. Objective The goal of the current study was to determine whether advanced age is associated with specific inflammatory CRS endotypes or immune signatures. Methods Levels of 17 mucus cytokines and inflammatory mediators were measured in 147 patients with CRS. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify and characterize inflammatory CRS endotypes, as well as to determine whether age was associated with specific immune signatures. Results A CRS endotype with a proinflammatory neutrophilic immune signature was enriched in older patients. In the overall cohort patients 60 years and older had increased mucus levels of IL‐1&bgr;, IL‐6, IL‐8, and TNF‐&agr; when compared with their younger counterparts. Increases in levels of proinflammatory cytokines were associated with both tissue neutrophilia and symptomatic bacterial infection/colonization in aged patients. Conclusions Aged patients with CRS have a unique inflammatory signature that corresponds to a neutrophilic proinflammatory response. Neutrophil‐driven inflammation in aged patients with CRS might be less likely to respond to corticosteroids and might be closely linked to chronic microbial infection or colonization. Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free