Value of C-reactive protein, white blood cells and neutrophils to distinguish appendicitis in pediatric patients
Abstract
Abstract The value for ordering laboratory tests like CRP for appendicitis in children is debatable. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic utility of CRP, WBC, and NP to differentiate acute and perforated appendicitis. A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients referred for appendicitis at CHEO from January 2016 to January 2019 was conducted. Comparisons of laboratory test results were made using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. ROC curves were used to examine diagnostic utility. One hundred and eighty (101 male) of 899 children with appendicitis had CRP, WBC, and NP levels available with a median age of 11.1 (8.1, 13.7) years. There were 93 (51.7%) patients with acute appendicitis and 87 (48.3%) were perforated. The median CRP level for patients with acute appendicitis was 20.3 (6.9, 38.3) versus 65.3 (48.7, 180.8) for perforated appendicitis (p <0.001). The area under the ROC curve for CRP was 85.1 % (95% C.I. 79.5-90.7), higher than that of WBC’s 68.1 % (95% C.I. 60.1- 76.1). Our study demonstrates that CRP can achieve good sensitivity without compromising specificity. These findings suggest that CRP performs better than WBC and NP in terms of discriminating between acute versus perforated appendicitis.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 899 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.