Evidence Hub

The DAG/PKC/CREB1/TGF-β1 axis drives shear-wave elastography stiffness and malignant progression in triple-negative breast cancer via lipid metabolic reprogramming

Shiyu Wang, Dongdong Zheng, Ziqi Wang, Ruo-Qing Hou, Zhiming Zhang, Zhan-Ping You, Jin Zhou, Yunxia Huang et al.

Cell Death and Disease, 2026

147 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

In clinical practice, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with varying levels of lipid metabolism exhibit differences in tumor shear-wave elastography (SWE) stiffness and prognosis, but this association with unclear mechanism. In this study, a clinical cohort from FUSCC (n = 147) demonstrated that both elevated BMI and higher SWE stiffness were significantly associated with poorer long-term prognosis in TNBC patients, and these associations were further validated in multi-TNBC animal models. Our findings emphasize the role of SWE stiffness in capturing BMI-related alterations in the tumor mechanical microenvironment. Based on integrated lipidomic and transcriptomic analyses, we demonstrated that diacylglycerol (DAG) serves as a critical lipid molecule promoting elevated SWE stiffness and malignant progression. Mechanistically, DAG upregulates TGF-β1 expression through PKC-mediated enhancement of CREB1 phosphorylation in multiple TNBC cell lines, directly promoting TNBC progression and activating cancer-associated fibroblasts. This creates a self-sustaining feedback loop that accelerates malignancy. Finally, we confirmed that the DAG/PKC/CREB1/TGF-β1 signaling axis profoundly regulates SWE imaging stiffness in TNBC models, with further validation in clinical samples. Our study establishes SWE stiffness as a non-invasive imaging biomarker for the activation of this specific pro-metastatic pathway, providing a mechanistic basis for interpreting SWE features through a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free