Evidence Hub

Radioactive contaminant permeation through skin: current understanding

F. A, S. K.

Journal of Radiological Protection, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

This review presents our current understanding of the permeation of radiochemicals through intact or slightly damaged skin from studies on human volunteers, experimental animals and radiological accidents involving contamination. The typical fractional absorption through intact skin for aqueous plutonium-239 in dilute nitric acid is <0.1%. Permeation of americium-241, cobalt-60, manganese-54 and promethium-147 is <0.1%, and cesium-137 and strontium-90 is <1% as dilute nitrate/chloride solution for several hours of contact with the skin. Permeation up to 1%–2% was found for Pu and Am through chemically injured skin and up to 10% when complexed with chelating agents such as DTPA. Iodine-125 as iodide and 99mTcO4− (technetium-99 as pertechnetate) showed permeation up to 60% through intact pig skin. The results for uranium compounds are widely varying and inconclusive, ranging from almost insignificant penetration to nearly 50% in one study. Noticeable differences were found for the permeation results obtained for the same substance through in vivo and in vitro methods and using different skin models. The permeability of radiochemicals through human skin is in general lower than that of commonly used animal skin models such as rat, rabbit and pig. Stratum corneum is the principal barrier preventing radionuclide entry and its damage rapidly enhances permeation, in some cases from insignificant level of intact skin to more than 50% transfer for damaged skin. Mechanisms for the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free