Evidence Hub

Neuropathic pain in CASPR2 antibody disease spectrum: A systematic review

Sara Cornacchini, M. Verza, Mattia Schiavolin, G. Spagni, Ebe Schiavo, A. Lotti, A. Farina, Deborah Leccese et al.

Journal of Neuroimmunology, 2025

216 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) antibodies are mainly linked to acquired neuromyotonia, limbic encephalitis and Morvan syndrome. Nevertheless, neuropathic pain is increasingly reported, though data on its characteristics remain limited. Here, we describe a patient with isolated neuropathic pain associated with CASPR2 antibodies and we conducted a systematic review to better define this relevant presentation.

METHODS

Index case was reported following CARE guidelines. The systematic review was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane, according to the updated PRISMA statement guidelines.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 216 patients with neuropathic pain in the context CASPR2 antibody disease spectrum, with isolated pain described in only 16/216 (7.4 %) cases. Pain was typically severe and presented as distal burning pain (74/147, 50.3 %), widespread pain with myalgia and cramps (31/147, 21.1 %), or severe back pain radiating to the legs (13/147, 8.8 %). Peripheral nerve hyperexcitability was found in 50/76 (65.8 %) of patients, while small nociceptive fiber dysfunction was identified in 16/19 (84.2 %). Immunotherapy, especially second line treatments, improved pain in 85.4 % (76/89) of cases, with complete remission of symptoms in 34/89 (38.2 %), while symptomatic treatment helped 55.1 % (27/49) of patients, with complete response in 10/49 (20.4 %). Long-term therapy was often needed, and relapses occurred in 5.2 % (5/96) after…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 216 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free