Evidence Hub

Developing a core outcome set for hand flexor tendon injuries: a systematic review of treatment outcomes

S. Deshmukh, C. Jerosch-Herold, Leanne K Miller, A. Fuller, Abbas See, P. Leighton, A. Karantana

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 2025

1 citation

Abstract

This study identifies the outcome domains used in recently published studies on the treatment of hand flexor tendon injuries in adults, in order to inform the development of a core outcome set (COS). Seven databases were searched from January 2013 to March 2023 for randomized and quasi-randomized studies, trial registrations, large observational studies, database studies and systematic reviews. From the 91 eligible original studies/trial registrations, the primary outcome was appropriately identified in only 52% (13/25) of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. We identified 419 author-defined outcomes, further categorized into 147 distinct outcomes and mapped into 72 outcome domains according to the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. The large heterogeneity in the outcome domains being assessed/measured across studies highlights the need for a consistent COS to be measured in future clinical research on hand flexor tendon injuries.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free