Tackling the small data problem in medical image classification with artificial intelligence: a systematic review
Abstract
Though medical imaging has seen a growing interest in AI research, training models require a large amount of data. In this domain, there are limited sets of data available as collecting new data is either not feasible or requires burdensome resources. Researchers are facing with the problem of small datasets and have to apply tricks to fight overfitting. 147 peer-reviewed articles were retrieved from PubMed, published in English, up until 31 July 2022 and articles were assessed by two independent reviewers. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyse (PRISMA) guidelines for the paper selection and 77 studies were regarded as eligible for the scope of this review. Adherence to reporting standards was assessed by using TRIPOD statement (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis). To solve the small data issue transfer learning technique, basic data augmentation and generative adversarial network were applied in 75%, 69% and 14% of cases, respectively. More than 60% of the authors performed a binary classification given the data scarcity and the difficulty of the tasks. Concerning generalizability, only four studies explicitly stated an external validation of the developed model was carried out. Full access to all datasets and code was severely limited (unavailable in more than 80% of studies). Adherence to reporting standards was suboptimal (<50% adherence for 13 of 37 TRIPOD items).…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.