Evidence Hub

Missing Data Imputation in the Context of Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review

Saghar Garayemi, R. A. A. Khoei, Sarah Friedrich

2025

2 citations

Abstract

Missing data is a common challenge in observational studies. Another challenge stems from the observational nature of the study itself. Here, propensity score analysis can be used as a technique to replicate conditions similar to those found in clinical trials. With regard to the missing data, a majority of studies only analyze the complete cases, but this has several pitfalls. In this review, we investigate which methods are used for the handling of missing data in the context of propensity score analyses. Therefore, we searched PubMed for the keywords propensity score and missing data, restricting our search to the time between January 2010 and February 2024. The PRISMA statement was followed in this review. A total of 147 articles were included in the analyses. A major finding of this study is that although the usage of multiple imputation (MI) has risen over time, only a limited number of studies describe the mechanism of missing data and the details of the MI algorithm. Keywords Missing data, Propensity Score, Observational Data, Multiple Imputation, Systematic Review

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free