Evidence Hub

Impact of artificial intelligence on healthcare-associated infection control: a systematic review

C. Barbati, L. Viviani, R. Vecchio, G. Arzilli, L. De Angelis, F. Baglivo, C. Rizzo, A. Odone

European Journal of Public Health, 2024

3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) represent a significant public health concern, correlating with increased morbidity, mortality rates and healthcare expenditures. While artificial intelligence (AI) systems offer transformative potential in enhancing HAIs detection and control practices, the actual performance effectiveness of these systems remains uncertain. This systematic review updates a previously published study from 2020 and evaluates the performance of AI-based tools for surveillance, detection, and control of HAIs. Methods PRISMA 2020 guidelines were applied. The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024513145). PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for experimental and observational studies assessing the performance of AI-based tools to detect and control HAIs, published in English. Results From 8,701 articles initially identified, 4,212 records were removed due to duplication. Out of 4,489 papers screened, 147 were included. Studies reported performance measures including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, precision, F1 score. Significant heterogeneity was found in the types of technology, infections targeted, health care settings and data sources between studies. Conclusions The increase in published evidence since the previous review reflects the growing interest and use of new technologies such as Large…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free