Evidence Hub

Robotic Surgery Conservative Approaches for Uterine Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review

M. Ardovino, Davide Pisani, P. De Franciscis, Ester Picone, A. Conte, Fatima Cherifi, M. Izzo, Emanuele Amabile et al.

Surgeries, 2026

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Adenomyosis is a common disorder of the uterus in those of reproductive age. Robotic-assisted surgery has been adopted to address the technical challenges of adenomyomectomy. This systematic review evaluated the current evidence regarding the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted conservative surgery for uterine adenomyosis. Methods: A systematic review of literature was performed on five databases, from the beginning to 21 December 2025, to identify studies reporting robotic-assisted uterus-sparing surgical approaches to adenomyosis. Data were collected on patient characteristics, surgical techniques used, pre- and post-operative pain, fertility outcomes, and complications. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I framework. Results: A total of 514 articles were found; six studies met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies were small and retrospective. The operative time ranged from 279 to 147 min. Mean blood loss ranged between 25 and 296 mL with a low rate of conversion and perioperative complications. Dysmenorrhea improved after surgery as reflected by the post operative visual analog scale pain score and serum CA-125 level. Few reproductive data were collected about successive spontaneous pregnancies. Risk of bias was serious or moderate in all studies included. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted conservative surgery for adenomyosis may represent a feasible and safe option for women with symptomatic adenomyosis who…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free