Surgical Management of Diabetic Foot Burns is Associated with Poor Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
There is no consensus for the optimal management of diabetic foot burn injuries. Here, we systematically identify studies reporting on diabetic foot burns and evaluate outcomes among patients managed operatively versus non-operatively. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Screening was performed by independent reviewers. Primary research studies with English full texts published between 1980 to 2023 that discussed outcomes of foot burns in adults with diabetes were included and critically appraised using validated tools. Results are presented using descriptive statistics of aggregated data. The search yielded 2,402 non-duplicate papers, of which 35 met inclusion criteria. Nine papers were included for meta-analysis, including seven retrospective comparative analyses, one cross-sectional study, and one retrospective chart review. There were 1798 diabetic foot burn patients. Mean age was 58.2 years (SD 4.12) and 73.1% (n = 1,314) were male. A total of 15.7% (n = 283) of patients were surgically managed, including debridement (3.7%, n = 66), grafting (8.2%, n = 147), flap (0.2%, n = 3), and primary amputation (7.1%, n = 127). Secondary amputation rate, defined as amputation following initial surgery, was 4.9%, (n = 14). The overall amputation rate was 7.8% (n = 141). Other complications included infection (4.0%, n = 72), osteomyelitis (1.9%, n = 34), and graft failure (8.2%, n = 12). One study reported functional status at last visit. Diabetic foot burns are highly…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,314 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.