Evidence Hub

Targeted Nipple-Areola Complex (NAC) Reinnervation (TNR): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Antoinette T. Nguyen, Rebeka A. Dejenie, Rena A. Li, Marco F Ellis, Robert D. Galiano

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2025

342 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background Loss of nipple-areola complex (NAC) sensation following mastectomy is a significant concern in both gender-affirming and oncologic breast surgery. Targeted nipple-areola complex reinnervation (TNR) has emerged as a technique to improve sensory outcomes by restoring nerve connections to the NAC. This study systematically reviews the literature and conducts a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of TNR in both gender-affirming mastectomy and oncologic breast reconstruction. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies reporting NAC neurotization outcomes. Studies were included if they assessed sensory recovery following TNR in gender-affirming mastectomy or oncologic breast reconstruction. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on four studies reporting monofilament thresholds, with separate meta-analyses conducted for areola sensation and peripheral breast sensation. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed. Results Twelve studies encompassing 342 participants (195 with TNR, 147 controls) were included. Meta-analysis of TNR in gender-affirming mastectomy patients demonstrated significantly improved NAC, areola, and peripheral breast skin sensation compared to controls (MD: − 1.73, 95% CI: − 2.15 to − 1.32, p < 0.0001, I2 = 67.78%; MD: − 1.73, 95% CI: − 1.91 to − 1.56, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%; MD: − 1.59, 95% CI: − 1.81 to − 1.37, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 342 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free