Evidence Hub

548 Diabetic Foot Burns and Amputation Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Brigette Cannata, Nicolas Malkoff, Deborah Choe, J. Gillenwater

Journal of Burn Care & Research, 2024

1,314 participants

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic metabolic diseases. Comorbid peripheral neuropathy (PN) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) puts this population at risk for foot burns and poor wound healing outcomes. There is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding the optimal approach for management of these unique injuries. The aim of this study is to systematically identify studies reporting on diabetic foot burns and critically evaluate outcomes including amputation rates among patients managed operatively versus non operatively. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was completed. Screening was performed by two independent reviewers. Primary research studies published between 1980 to 2023 that discussed outcomes of foot burns in adult patients with DM were included. Studies that included pediatric (< 18 years old) or animal subjects, had inaccessible full texts, or were written in a language other than English were excluded. All conflicts were resolved collaboratively. The included studies were critically appraised using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), JBI critical appraisal tool for analytical cross-sectional studies, or a published methodological tool. Results are presented using descriptive statistics of aggregated data. Results The database search yielded 2,402 non-duplicate papers, which was narrowed to 105 full texts following initial screening. A total of 35 papers met inclusion criteria, 5 of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,314 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free